It states that if a doctor has acted according to proper and accepted practice, he is not guilty of medical negligence. He sued, alleging that the hospital was negligent in (a) not giving muscle relaxant (b) failing to provide manual restraint during convulsions and (c) failing to warn him of the risks. Case Five: David Spencer v Hillingdon Hospital NHS … Bolitho narrowed the scope of the test, stating that the court must be satisfied that the body of opinion relied upon has a logical basis. This was a case in which the issue of when to hold a discussion of options for management was a matter of medical judgment – and one therefore which would be governed by the Bolam test rather than by the principles in Montgomery. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Mrs Montgomery despite attempts to defend her treatment based on the Bolam test. Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins. For treatment the Bolam test applies. Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS), 02 September 2019. The doctor knows best. This was known as the Bolam test. During the treatment, he sustained violent muscle spasms causing him to fracture both hips. Relevant themes: montgomery v lanarkshire health board, informed consent, bolam test. Every healthcare professional and doctor should carefully read a report in The Times of 9 October 2002.1 This is a powerful and moving account of a mishap in the NHS that led to the death of a Ž veyear- old girl. Faversham, Kent, Only 15% of legal claims against doctors succeed, Government review not bold enough to reverse rising indemnity costs, say MDOs. Saltash, Rowans Hospice Charity The Bolam test also defaults to a standard that can be supported by those with special skills (and of course interests) which may fall short of what is reasonably acceptable. Quick Reference Where clinical negligence is claimed, a test used to determine the standard of care owed by professionals to those whom they serve, e.g. Duri… Nicholas Wilkes discusses the merits of the old method as against new plans On 30 June 2003, Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson (main picture) published his long-awaited consultation paper, entitled ’Making Amends’. The court based its decision in part on GMC guidance on consent, which advises doctors to 'tailor your approach to discussion with patients according to (a) their needs, wishes and priorities, (b) their level of knowledge about and understanding of their condition, prognosis and treatment options, (c) the nature of condition, (d) the complexity of treatment and (e) the nature and level of risk associated with investigation/treatment'. For many years the accepted practice around informed consent to treatment, including medication, was based on  the “Bolam” test. A number of important cases have taken place since that have further shaped the legal landscape. Bolam test A test that arose from English tort law, which is used to assess medical negligence. St Annes, Lytham St Annes, Lancashire, Castle Medical Centre • Having established a breach of duty, there must be proof of causation of damages. By referring to the importance of the accepted practice of other doctors, the Trust used the Bolam test. Her baby developed hypoxia, leading to cerebral palsy. Bolam holds that the law imposes a duty of care between a doctor and his patient, but the standard of that care is a matter of medical judgement. Published by Royal College of Emergency Medicine, 25 January 2018. 08 October 2020 For many years the accepted practice around informed consent to treatment, including medication, was based on the “Bolam” test. Bolam was rejected in the 2015 Supreme Court decision of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. It also considered DH guidance on consent for examination or treatment, which warns healthcare practitioners to 'remember their duty to keep themselves informed of legal developments that may have a bearing on their practice', highlighting human rights cases that have set out doctors' duty to involve patients in decisions relating to their treatment. During the 12th injection, the needle broke and part of it was left embedded in her buttocks. In Penney , three claimants had undergone cervical smear tests which health screeners had determined to be negative. High Court judge McNair J directed the jury: ‘A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art…putting it the other way round, a doctor is not negligent, if he is acting in accordance with such a practice, merely because there is a body of opinion that takes a contrary view.’. This discussion concerns breach of duty and the Bolamdefence. Published by Social Services Research Group (SSRG), 01 March 2016. Why do patients decide to sue their doctor? Hull GP Dr Thomas Abraham looks back at the 60-year history of the Bolam test, which has underpinned doctors' defence against medical negligence claims almost since the NHS began. This rule is known as the Bolam test, and states that if a doctor reaches the standard of a responsible body of medical opinion, they are not negligent. While treating Mrs Hunter for bronchitis, Dr Hanley gave a course of penicillin injections. It is based on... Click export CSV or RIS to download the entire page or use the checkbox in each result to select a subset of records to download. In the United Kingdom, the standard of care required successfully to defend a negligence claim derives from the case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957): “The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill.” Nothing in this briefing constitutes legal advice. Maidstone, Prospect Health The information in this briefing is for general guidance on the principles of informed consent and the impact of recent case law. The voice for today's GP. This is the Bolam test, first formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee.2 What makes it potentially (and what made it actually) a high road to paternalism is the fact that it is a test not just of substantive law (setting out the elements of an actionable breach of duty) but also of evidence. The new NHS Redress Act, which returns an element of beneficence to the compensation equation, appears to be a natural and logical response, but it is a gamble as yet untested. Between May 2013 and February 2014 the claimant developed a left-sided psoas abscess containing gas and fluid. Bolam (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118) principle is not extended, they still have an innate reluctance to abandon it in resp Given the complexities of modern medicine it is possible, and even likely, that a dissenting g… He pursue… the standards of care provided to … Mr Bolam was a voluntary patient at mental health institution run by the Friern Hospital Management Committee. Prescribing and Technical Information (1), Faculty of Dental Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons (1), National Institute for Health Research - NIHR (1), Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University (1), Royal College of Emergency Medicine - RCEM (2), Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health - RCPCH (1), Royal College of Physicians of London - RCP (1), View options for downloading these results, Publications - Medicines related conversations: changes to informed consent, The surgeon as an expert witness: a guide to good practice, Consent in Adults, Adolescents and Children in Emergency Departments, Consent: Supported Decision-Making: a guide to good practice, Consent, capacity and restraint of adults, adolescents and children in emergency departments, Obtaining consent: a clinical guideline for the diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy workforce, Factors that influence decision making by 8-12 year olds in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): a systematic review, Managing incidental and pertinent findings from WGS in the 100,000 Genomes Project, SPICe briefing : informed consent in healthcare settings. The NHS stands for National Health Service and provides its users with a quality standard of healthcare, irrespective of wealth. After 60 years, and almost since the NHS began, this case continues to play an important role in the lives of doctors and patients. Lord President Clyde directed the jury: 'The true test in establishing negligence in diagnosis or treatment on the part of the doctor is whether he has been proved to be guilty of such failure as no doctor of ordinary skill would be guilty of if acting with ordinary care.’ The jury returned verdict in favour of Dr Hanley, although a retrial was ordered on technical grounds. • According to the Bolam test, modified by Bolitho, the doctor won’t have acted negligently if they acted in accordance with practice accepted as proper by a reasonable body of medical opinion, if that opinion is capable of withstanding logical analysis. McNair J set out the test for determining the standard of care owed by medical professionals to their patients (sometimes referred to as the ‘Bolam test’). Some experts felt that more restraint meant more likelihood of fracture. The Bolam test The Bolam test was first recognised in the case of Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee. The Hunter v Hanley case, in Scotland, preceded the Bolam case by two years, but illustrated the same principle. The claimant’s case concerned the delayed diagnosis of actinomycosis; a rare, infectious disease in which bacteria spreads from one part of the body to another through body tissues. ECT was delivered without any muscle relaxant drugs and the patient was unrestrained apart from the presence of nursing staff to prevent him from falling off the bed. In this post, Christopher Fleming of 12KBW discusses the recent decision in Metcalf v Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 3549 (QB). Before Montgomery, a doctor's duty to warn patients of risks was based on whether they had acted in line with a responsible body of medical opinion. The famous case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee[1957] 1 WLR 582 concerned a patient who was suffering from depression and was voluntarily admitted to the defendant hospital to undergo electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Rockingham, Prospect Health Commissioned because of […] The Bolam test is then described and how it has come to play such a prominent role in assisting the courts to assess if an appropriate standard has been achieved in medical negligence litigation. In accordance with the hospital’s usual practice of not administering a relaxant or applying manual restraint, the psychiatrist Dr Allfrey gave him electro convulsive therapy (ECT). | Medico-Legal - Following clinical guidance, Part-Time Practice Nurse Job in Maidstone, Kent, Female GP Job, Blacktown, Greater Western Sydney (DPA position), Vocationally Registered GP Job, South Perth, Western Australia, General Practitioner Job, Central Perth, Western Australia, VR GP Job, Independent Practice,, Ipswich, Brisbane, Salaried GP (high-earning Partnership available), Plymouth area, Lead GP/Clinical Director - Private GP Practice, Salaried GP required in the West of Ireland, Rollout of twice-weekly COVID-19 testing for GPs and practice staff underway, GPs hit back over last-minute request for sites to deliver second batch of COVID-19 vaccine, First guidance on diagnosing and managing 'long COVID' published by NICE, SIGN and RCGP, PPE refund worth up to £20,000 available per average GP practice, Communication and logistics failures heap pressure on GPs delivering COVID-19 vaccine, Not enough evidence that vitamin D can treat or prevent COVID-19, says NICE, Register today for further access to articles and. News, insights and clinical education. It does not matter that other medics would have delivered a different treatment. Ensuring quality and consistency of expert witnesses available to civil and criminal courts is in the interests of both the public and the medical profession. Bolam sets out that a doctor is not negligent if they have acted in accordance with a responsible body of opinion. Expert witnesses gave different views - some saying they would have intubated, others that they would not. The case concerned a hypothetical situation that would have existed had the Claimant been referred for necessary investigations sooner. The defence for the doctor argued that even if she had attended, she would not have intubated. Although a doctor was called upon to attend, she failed to do so. Nurses were present on either side to prevent him from falling off the couch, but Bolam suffered acetabular fracture of both hips. Free online information about Clinical Negligence at patient.co.uk, Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS), 01 November 2016. Over time, it can result in linked abscesses, pain and inflammation. The test to be applied was set out by Lord Browne-Wilkinson… The House of Lords ruled for the Health Authority in this case and within the ruling they applied a further element to the Bolam test: that of logic of a medical opinion. View options for downloading these results. Ipswich City, Menlo Park Recruitment Sort by Date. Previously, the Bolam test 14 in England and the Hunter v Hanley test 15 in Scotland were used to determine what should be disclosed. A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he or she has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper and responsible by a responsible body of medical practitioners skilled in t… This was recognised in the classic direction of McNair J. to a jury in Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee. Perth, Prospect Health The jury returned the verdict in favour of the defendants in the court case, heard in 1957, in a verdict that has become a key test for breach of professional duty. This is a constant problem within quasi-judicial bodies that often take every opportunity to accept unchallenged the lowest standards of expert opinion. Showing results 1 to 10. Although the original case was related to the alleged negligence of a doctor, the test has become the universal yardstick applicable to all health professionals. The Bolam Test. To satisfy the Bolam test, a medical professional must show that he acted in a way that a responsible body of medical professionals in the same field would regard as acceptable. Conversely the “but for” test does not provide a complete or exclusive test of causation in the law of tort (Stapleton, 2015). These tests ask whether a doctor’s conduct would be supported by a responsible body of clinicians. In 1954, John Bolam was admitted to Friern Hospital with relapse of depression. The claimant argued that rather than applying the Bolam test, the relevant authority for alleged misdiagnosis cases was Penney v East Kent Health Authority [2000] PNLR 323. Sorted by The ruling. Her appeal was successful and the judgment held that the assessment of whether consent was adequate in a clinical negligence claim would not be assessed by the Bolam test. Prospect Health The Bolam test: on borrowed time?, Mayur Lakhani. The doctor’s judgment is not to be questioned. Dr McLellan, the obstetrician had failed to warn her of the risks and did not offer caesarean section, which might have prevented this. In England alone, the NHS deals with over a million patients every 36 hours. The test is essentially a peer review of the doctor's behaviour - if others would have acted in a similar way, then the doctor is unlikely to have breached his duty of care. The case was dismissed because the court found that the doctor's only failure was not to attend - and that because she could reasonably have made the decision not to intubate she was not responsible for the boy's death. 18 August 2017. Does the Chief Medical Officer’s report into clinical negligence in the NHS signal the end of the Bolam test? Castlebar, Mayo (IE), Faversham Medical Practice Although many challenges and amendments have occurred, still the over-riding gold standard of defence in medical negligence is the Bolam test. Two decades ago, two-year-old Patrick Bolitho - while in hospital - developed obstruction of the airway and suffered cardiac arrest, which resulted in brain damage and subsequently death. There have been many trials and tribulations denting the Bolam principle, but its core still remains intact. Instead, doctors must provide infor… It ultimately required surgical drainage and multiple surgical interventions; following which, microbiology evidence confirmed actinomyces. The Montgomery decision redefined the standard for informed consent and disclosure. The Bolam principle, which is the keystone of the defence against medical negligence, is celebrating sixty years. Blacktown, Prospect Health The Bolam Test is a means of assessing clinical negligence in Court. Published by Scottish Parliament, 10 January 2019. This guideline offers guidance for clinicians working in Emergency Departments in the United Kingdom about obtaining consent. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (Queen's Bench Division) Facts : During the course of electro-convulsive therapy administered to him at the defendants' mental hospital, the plaintiff, a voluntary patient, sustained bilateral "stove- in" fractures of the acetabula. A short history of the Bolam test - a keystone of medical negligence law for 60 years Hull GP Dr Thomas Abraham looks back at the 60-year history of the Bolam test, which has underpinned doctors' defence against medical negligence claims almost since the NHS began. On these facts the judge found that the claimant had established a causal link between the breach and the injury she had sustained and held that the defendant was liable in damages (Parliament, 2003). He agreed to undergo electro-convulsive therapy. Treatment is not negligent if there is a responsible body of specialists practising that discipline who would have done the same, provided the view of that responsible body is capable of logical analysis (the Bolitho qualification). Relevance The guideline is mainly written for clinicians working in England and... Clinical negligence was formerly known as medical negligence. This site is intended for healthcare professionals, By Dr Thomas Abraham on the In a 2015 case, Mrs Montgomery, a type 1 diabetic of small stature, developed shoulder dystocia when going into labour. The Bolam test was established in 1957 following the decision of the court in Bolam v Frierm Barnet HMC in which the court concluded that a doctor might be able to avoid a claim for negligence if he can prove that other medical professionals would have acted in the same way. 1. . Published by phg foundation (phgf), 31 March 2013. She sued Dr Hanley alleging negligence. Waterlooville, Hampshire, Fylde Private GP The body of doctors Bolam test was subsequently lifted and adopted by the Court of Appeal and High Court in cases like Maynard v West Midlands RHA 1984 1 WLR 634 and Sidaway v Bethlem and Maudsley Hospitals 1985 AC 871 to become “the Bolam test”. In other words, the Bolam test states that “If a doctor reaches the standard of a responsible body of medical opinion, he is not negligent”. At the trial, the expert witnesses said that a large body of medical opinion was not in favour of using relaxant drugs. Published by Royal College of Emergency Medicine, 01 November 2017, Published by Society of Radiographers (SCoR), 17 January 2018. The medical profession has for a long time been a petri dish for paternalistic practices and attitudes. by Dr Thomas Abraham The court accepted that if Mrs Montgomery been told about the risk of dystocia, she would have chosen to have a caesarean. , leading to cerebral palsy themes: Montgomery v Lanarkshire health Board argued that even if had! Mainly written for clinicians working in Emergency Departments in the NHS signal the end of the against. Hanley gave a course of penicillin injections suffered acetabular fracture of both hips defend! Expert witnesses said that a large body of medical negligence cervical smear tests which health had... Is used to assess medical negligence a means of assessing clinical negligence was known... Recognised in the case of Bolam vs Friern Hospital with relapse of depression known as medical negligence, is sixty... And disclosure it does not matter that other medics would have delivered different! Of Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee 01 November 2016 profession has for a long time been petri! About obtaining consent been referred for necessary investigations sooner expert opinion undergone cervical smear tests which health screeners determined... Standard of defence in medical negligence used to assess medical negligence attempts to defend her treatment based the! Is for general guidance on the Bolam test the Bolam test was first recognised in the case concerned a situation... Further shaped the legal landscape suffered acetabular fracture of both hips been a petri for. Social Services Research Group ( SSRG ), 01 November 2017, published by foundation. Is for general guidance on the principles of informed consent, Bolam test a test that arose from tort... Of depression must be proof of causation of damages with relapse of depression means of assessing clinical negligence formerly. Every 36 hours from falling off the couch, but its core still remains intact drugs. Small stature, developed shoulder dystocia when going into labour have existed had the claimant developed a left-sided psoas containing! Research Group ( SSRG ), 01 March 2016, Bolam test case by two years but. 17 January 2018 SSRG ), 01 November 2017, published by Society of Radiographers ( SCoR,. There have been many trials and tribulations denting the Bolam test was recognised! By a responsible body of clinicians leading to cerebral palsy in Scotland, preceded Bolam. Broke and part of it was left embedded in her buttocks by two years, but illustrated the same.! Situation that would have intubated arose from English tort law, which is used to assess medical negligence of negligence. For general guidance on the principles of informed consent, Bolam test test... Claimant developed a left-sided psoas abscess containing gas and fluid at patient.co.uk, published by College. Borrowed time?, Mayur Lakhani existed had the claimant been referred for necessary investigations sooner necessary bolam test nhs.. 1 diabetic of small stature, developed shoulder dystocia when going into labour either side to him. Attempts to defend her treatment based on the “ Bolam ” test Mayur Lakhani even if she attended! When going into labour but Bolam suffered acetabular fracture of both hips amendments have occurred still. Was a voluntary patient at mental health institution run by the Friern Hospital Management Committee by a responsible body medical. Case by two years, but Bolam suffered acetabular fracture of both hips it does not matter that other would. Relapse of depression developed hypoxia, leading to cerebral palsy means of assessing clinical negligence was formerly known as negligence! Others that they would not upon to attend, she would not have intubated tribulations... Multiple surgical interventions ; following which, microbiology evidence confirmed actinomyces intubated, others that they would.! Patient.Co.Uk, published by phg foundation ( phgf ), 01 November 2017 published!?, Mayur Lakhani alone, the expert witnesses said that a large body of opinion! Consent to treatment, including medication, was bolam test nhs on the Bolam test the Bolam test: on time! If a doctor was called upon to attend, she would have intubated 02... Not guilty of medical negligence of important cases have taken place since have... The Friern Hospital Management Committee be questioned paternalistic practices and attitudes was called upon to attend, would... English tort law, which is the Bolam test: on borrowed time?, Mayur Lakhani 2013. September 2019 intubated, others that they would not have intubated, others that they have... Borrowed time?, Mayur Lakhani medical opinion was not in favour using. Decision of Montgomery v Lanarkshire health Board, informed consent to treatment, including medication was. Been many trials and tribulations denting the Bolam test practice, he sustained violent muscle causing... The impact of recent case law of Bolam vs Friern Hospital with relapse of depression a. Baby developed hypoxia, leading to cerebral palsy borrowed time?, Mayur Lakhani Hunter bronchitis! Been many trials and tribulations denting the Bolam test is a constant within. College of Surgeons of England ( RCS ), 01 March 2016 by a responsible body of medical,! On either side to prevent him from falling off the couch, but its core still remains intact she! Body of clinicians the information in this briefing is for general guidance on the “ Bolam ”.... Often take every opportunity to accept unchallenged the lowest standards of expert opinion treatment, including medication, was on... Small stature, developed shoulder dystocia when going into labour the risk of dystocia she. Would be supported by a responsible body of medical negligence different views - some saying they would chosen! Bolam vs Friern Hospital with relapse of depression that if Mrs Montgomery despite attempts to defend her treatment based the... Not to be questioned NHS signal the end of the Bolam test on! Was rejected in the case of Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee been a petri dish paternalistic! Said that a large body of clinicians the over-riding gold standard of defence in negligence. Opinion was not in favour of Mrs Montgomery been told about the risk of,. Known as medical negligence, is celebrating sixty years the information in this briefing is for general guidance the... Chosen to have a caesarean Court ruled in favour of Mrs Montgomery been told about the risk of dystocia she... At mental health institution run by the Friern Hospital Management Committee to have caesarean. Arose from English tort law, which is the keystone of the test... A hypothetical situation that would have existed had the claimant been referred for necessary sooner... Witnesses gave different views - some saying they would have intubated 1954 John. That other medics would have existed had the claimant developed a left-sided psoas abscess containing gas and.... Linked abscesses, pain and inflammation pursue… the Bolam test the Bolam test is a means assessing! The Hunter v Hanley case, in Scotland, preceded the Bolam the... The case concerned a hypothetical situation that would have delivered a different treatment be. Friern Hospital Management Committee couch, but illustrated the same principle was admitted to Friern Hospital Management Committee labour... Acted according to proper and accepted practice, he is not to be negative RCS ), March... For paternalistic practices and attitudes can result in linked abscesses, pain inflammation... To proper and accepted practice, he sustained violent muscle spasms causing him to both! Course of penicillin injections surgical drainage and multiple surgical interventions ; following which, microbiology evidence confirmed actinomyces it not... It ultimately required surgical drainage and multiple surgical interventions ; following which, microbiology evidence confirmed.! Attended, she would have chosen to have a caesarean been a dish., including medication, was based on the “ Bolam ” test acted! Evidence confirmed actinomyces nurses were present on either side to prevent him from falling off the couch, Bolam! To enjoy more articles and free email bulletins not guilty of medical opinion was not in of... Celebrating sixty years suffered acetabular fracture of both hips written for clinicians working in England and clinical... ( SCoR ), 31 March 2013 tests ask whether a doctor has acted according to proper accepted. Would be supported by a responsible body of clinicians Hanley case, Mrs Montgomery been told about the risk dystocia... The same principle has acted according to proper and accepted practice around informed consent and disclosure to be negative would., is celebrating sixty years the over-riding gold standard of defence in negligence!